"No, I don't want it to get pornographic, but nudity is not immoral no matter what your parish priests may say. We come into this world nakkid and if we're blessed we actually get to spend time while we're here in that natural and very healthy state."

It may not be immoral but it doesn't scream professional in a business sense.

If this site wishes to attract higher paying ad clients, ShareCG will have to (or should) put nudity restrictions on thumbs in order to appear more business professional friendly. Total artistic freedom does not apply in this circumstance, it does apply on your own sites depending on your website host.

How soon do you think this site would last if the person, whom has that fetish harness here, posted Laura in her normal young teen state nude in that harness? Luckily, that person morphed her into an older look & used a "bodysuit" to cover her parts, so there is no issue BUT what if others in the future are not so careful? There ARE laws that forbid child/minor images that are suggestive/nude/sexual imagery, this includes 3D images. Aiko may be an anime figure but with certain characters, she looks like a child.

Argue til the cows come home for & against nudity, fact is there has to be a line that makes both sides happy & that will appeal to advertisers, not scare them off thinking they hit Renderotica instead.......

Whatever is said about nudity, nobody seems to know a good reason why a nudity flag is need. I mean: A real reason why artistic nudity is bad. This bushwa about a few companies with eccentric morality isn't a reason.

We don't talk about BDSM or whatever (can't believe that this is mentioned while talking about simple innocent nudity). 

Whether a site is in it for the money or not makes no difference to me...What does make a difference is my grandkids come over be looking over my shoulder, I don't want them seeing boobies and beaver floating around. To me nothing wrong with nudity. like the one poster put a body suit on the harness outfit thats cool. anyone can do that and not take away from the promo image.

""""I agree let's don't go down the long nasty road of what is and what isn't lets just let the higher ups come up with some type of guidlines, sooner or later they will have to make a decision.  My intention was to bring it to their attention what they decide is up to them""""

Quoting my on quote 

Obviously some of the men can't read this, nothing was said about going back to dark ages,no one said this site is or could be a [censored] site either, no one said nudity was not part of art

READ MY QUOTE AND CLOSE THIS THREAD ENOUGH HAS BEEN SAID THIS IS GOING NO WHERE ITS UP TO ADMIN BOTTOM LINE NUFF SAID

http://www.sharecg.com/pf/shadow_dancer 

You know what I was going to drop this and still want to but if you think nudity is not close to [censored] check in this gallery if it is okay then you have a major problem, because  half of the images posted are pure [censored]. Even one of herself

And why is it okay to have censored animations but not in other area's as you said in the animation forum P.O.R.N. is not a bad word yet take a look at some of these and try telling people this is NOT PURE [censored]. 

Check it out  fight amongest yourselves I'm finished with this whole situation strange though most who say it is okay are men.  WONDER WHY?

not really could care less what you do or what this site does if this site can't take an honorable suggestion then they don't need half the people here.

Admin close this thread please

no one said nudity is evil accept in your own mind

give it up enough is enough

"Whatever is said about nudity, nobody seems to know a good reason why a nudity flag is need. I mean: A real reason why artistic nudity is bad. This bushwa about a few companies with eccentric morality isn't a reason.

We don't talk about BDSM or whatever (can't believe that this is mentioned while talking about simple innocent nudity). "

Good Reasons for Nudity Fliters:

#1: People at work can browse this site without getting into hot water with the boss. Equals more hits for members.

#2: Attracting better advertisers that do not wish to associate their products with erotic/p.0.r.n loaded imagery. Public opinion is a powerful thing, companies will drop any controversial issues like a hot potato.

#3: Prevention from possible lawsuits from morality groups. You know someone will do it, just a matter of time........

#4: Just to tick you off (should be number 1).

Artisitic nudity and gratuitous nudity are two different things. The reason I mentioned the harness was because that person did the right thing in regards to covering the models while still showcasing his harness, the other person mentioned in the first post didn't and he should have. Was he showcasing a skin texture? No, a piece of clothing that nudity was not required for. That's the difference.

If you're offering a headdress or a pair of shorts, I shouldn't have to see bare breasts in the promo and neither should anyone else. :/

Thats the same thing we do in my tube group. 

 My kids are used to seeing me work on things prior to putting clothing on them.  My youngest just goes aw god moms playing with naked people again!